[Community] La FSF *sconsiglia* le Creative Commons

[list a attivista.com]

Grossi scriveva:
http://www.creativecommons.it/pipermail/community/2005-July/000783.html
[..]
Quindi, non solo dobbiamo archiviare quanto accaduto a Montreal come uno
spiacevole inconveniente non destinato a ripetersi, ma dobbiamo anche
circoscrivere il dibattito *alla sua reale portata*.
[..] 

Danilo Moi risponde:
La sua "reale portata" sembra questa.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
[...] Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 2.0 license
This is a copyleft free license meant for artistic works and entertainment 
works. Please don't use it for software or documentation, since it is 
incompatible with the GNU GPL and with the GNU FDL.
There is literally no specific freedom that all Creative Commons licenses 
grant. Therefore, to say that a work "uses a Creative Commons license" is to 
leave all important questions about the work's licensing unanswered. When 
you see such a statement, please suggest making it clearer. And if someone 
proposes to "use a Creative Commons license" for a certain work, it is vital 
to ask immediately "Which one?"
****We recommend using the Free Art License***, rather than this one, so as 
to avoid augmenting *****the problem caused by the vagueness of "a Creative 
Commons license".**** [...] 


lettura correlata:
Perchè Stallman e la Free Software Foundation non supportano più le Creative 
Commons?
http://www.attivista.com/2005/luglio/stallman_creative_commons.html 


Un saluto
Danilo Moi
 ------------------------------------------------------------------
Il mercante meditò sul potere ed escogitò la democrazia al fine di comprarsi 
i voti (D. Moi)