{"id":732,"date":"2013-10-21T13:06:15","date_gmt":"2013-10-21T11:06:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/creativecommons.it\/chapterIT\/?p=732"},"modified":"2019-12-11T17:54:10","modified_gmt":"2019-12-11T16:54:10","slug":"riforma-del-diritto-dautore-policy-statement-di-creative-commons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/creativecommons.it\/chapterIT\/index.php\/732\/","title":{"rendered":"Riforma del Diritto d&#8217;autore: policy statement di Creative Commons"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"content\">\n<div class=\"field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden\">\n<div class=\"field-items\">\n<div class=\"field-item even\">\n<div align=\"center\"><img decoding=\"async\" title=\"Reform Graphic\" src=\"http:\/\/www.creativecommons.it\/ccitfiles\/reform-graphic.png\" alt=\"Reform Graphic\" width=\"400\" border=\"0\" hspace=\"5\" \/><\/div>\n<p>Creative Commons ha recentemente sviluppato un<span>\u00a0<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/about\/reform\"><b>policy statement<\/b><\/a><span>\u00a0<\/span>in tema di<span>\u00a0<\/span><b>riforma del diritto d&#8217;autore<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p>Nella sua dichiarazione di policy, Creative Commons ribadisce come la diffusione e l&#8217;impiego di strumenti quali le<span>\u00a0<\/span><b>licenze libere<\/b><span>\u00a0<\/span>di diritto d&#8217;autore<span>\u00a0<\/span><b>non possano considerarsi sufficienti<\/b><span>\u00a0<\/span>al conseguimento di un accesso universale ed effettivo alla ricerca, istruzione e cultura. Questo perch\u00e9 le licenze CC operano pur sempre nel quadro definito dalle vigenti legislazioni in materia di Diritto d&#8217;autore, le quali, per via della loro attuale formulazione, pongono numerosi limiti alla circolazione e al riutilizzo creativo dei contenuti. Pertanto, il conseguimento di quei<span>\u00a0<\/span><b>benefici sociali e economici<\/b><span>\u00a0<\/span>che una maggiore circolazione delle opere d&#8217;ingegno (e quindi, in ultimo, della conoscenza) permetterebbe di conseguire potr\u00e0 realizzarsi compiutamente<span>\u00a0<\/span><b>soltanto attraverso iniziative di revisione e modifica alla normativa sul Diritto d&#8217;autore<\/b><span>\u00a0<\/span>stessa.<\/p>\n<p>Per questi motivi, Creative Commons supporta le iniziative di riforma del copyright, attualmente in corso, volte a rafforzare i diritti degli utilizzatori dei contenuti ed espandere il pubblico dominio.<\/p>\n<p>L&#8217;<a href=\"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/weblog\/entry\/39639\">annuncio ufficiale<\/a><span>\u00a0<\/span>\u00e8 disponibile sul sito di Creative Commons.<\/p>\n<p>Di seguito, riportiamo il testo in inglese del policy statement:<\/p>\n<div><em>Creative Commons (CC) has enabled a new approach to copyright licensing over the last ten years. CC licenses facilitate novel social, educational, technological, and business practices, and support productive relationships around networked knowledge and culture.<\/em><em>We are dedicated stewards of our licenses and tools, and we educate users, institutions, and policymakers about the positive benefits of adopting CC licenses. Our licenses will always provide voluntary options for creators who wish to share their material on more open terms than current copyright systems allow. But the CC vision\u2014universal access to research and education and full participation in culture\u2014will not be realized through licensing alone.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Around the world, numerous national governments are reviewing or revising their copyright law. Some proposed revisions would broaden the scope of uses of copyrighted works permitted without the rightsholder\u2019s permission. In response, it has been suggested that the very success of CC licenses means that copyright reform is unnecessary\u2014that the licenses solve any problems for users that might otherwise exist. This is certainly not the case. CC licenses are a patch, not a fix, for the problems of the copyright system. They apply only to works whose creators make a conscious decision to affirmatively license the right for the public to exercise exclusive rights that the law automatically grants to them. The success of open licensing demonstrates the benefits that sharing and remixing can bring to individuals and society as a whole. However, CC operates within the frame of copyright law, and as a practical matter, only a small fraction of copyrighted works will ever be covered by our licenses.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Our experience has reinforced our belief that to ensure the maximum benefits to both culture and the economy in this digital age, the scope and shape of copyright law need to be reviewed. However well-crafted a public licensing model may be, it can never fully achieve what a change in the law would do, which means that law reform remains a pressing topic. The public would benefit from more extensive rights to use the full body of human culture and knowledge for the public benefit. CC licenses are not a substitute for users\u2019 rights, and CC supports ongoing efforts to reform copyright law to strengthen users\u2019 rights and expand the public domain.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Creative Commons ha recentemente sviluppato un\u00a0policy statement\u00a0in tema di\u00a0riforma del diritto d&#8217;autore. Nella sua dichiarazione di policy, Creative Commons ribadisce come la diffusione e l&#8217;impiego di strumenti quali le\u00a0licenze libere\u00a0di diritto d&#8217;autore\u00a0non possano considerarsi sufficienti\u00a0al conseguimento di un accesso universale ed effettivo alla ricerca, istruzione e cultura. Questo perch\u00e9 le licenze CC operano pur sempre &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.it\/chapterIT\/index.php\/732\/\" class=\"more-link\">Read More<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Riforma del Diritto d&#8217;autore: policy statement di Creative Commons&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-732","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-notizie"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.it\/chapterIT\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/732","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.it\/chapterIT\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.it\/chapterIT\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.it\/chapterIT\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.it\/chapterIT\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=732"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.it\/chapterIT\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/732\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":733,"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.it\/chapterIT\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/732\/revisions\/733"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.it\/chapterIT\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=732"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.it\/chapterIT\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=732"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.it\/chapterIT\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=732"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}